<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EncodeHD 1.0.94.0 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dcunningham.net/2009/05/29/encodehd-10940-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dcunningham.net/2009/05/29/encodehd-10940-released/</link>
	<description>Tech Tools and IT Infrastructure thoughts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:50:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://dcunningham.net/2009/05/29/encodehd-10940-released/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcunningham.net/?p=417#comment-661</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom. I sent you an email directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='pce-enabled-section'>Hey Tom. I sent you an email directly.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Simpson</title>
		<link>http://dcunningham.net/2009/05/29/encodehd-10940-released/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcunningham.net/?p=417#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Ok, how about for the list you place a big green checkmark or something to the side of each item that has been encoded?  Then everyone&#039;s happy.  I can see what has been converted, and people still have a list of what has been encoded?

I&#039;ve got the log file, here&#039;s one for one of the stretched files:

- Edit by Dan: I&#039;ve taken out the log as it was pretty big</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='pce-enabled-section'>Ok, how about for the list you place a big green checkmark or something to the side of each item that has been encoded?  Then everyone&#8217;s happy.  I can see what has been converted, and people still have a list of what has been encoded?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got the log file, here&#8217;s one for one of the stretched files:</p>
<p>- Edit by Dan: I&#8217;ve taken out the log as it was pretty big</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://dcunningham.net/2009/05/29/encodehd-10940-released/comment-page-1/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcunningham.net/?p=417#comment-646</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,

I had initially implemented item removal, but I kept getting requests to take it out! People kept forgetting what they had finished encoding and having the list on-screen when the process was finished seemed to help. I&#039;ll look at putting it back in maybe.

Hmm, can you get me a log of this happening?

Quality *can* be modified by changing the FFmpeg settings in the advanced interface. If you want to limit the bitrate, use &quot;-b 1000k&quot; where 1000 is your preferred bitrate. I don&#039;t intend to make this a UI setting, as it tends to confuse matters for non-technical people, and simplicity is what I think sets EncodeHD apart from other encoders.

Cheers, Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='pce-enabled-section'>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>I had initially implemented item removal, but I kept getting requests to take it out! People kept forgetting what they had finished encoding and having the list on-screen when the process was finished seemed to help. I&#8217;ll look at putting it back in maybe.</p>
<p>Hmm, can you get me a log of this happening?</p>
<p>Quality *can* be modified by changing the FFmpeg settings in the advanced interface. If you want to limit the bitrate, use &#8220;-b 1000k&#8221; where 1000 is your preferred bitrate. I don&#8217;t intend to make this a UI setting, as it tends to confuse matters for non-technical people, and simplicity is what I think sets EncodeHD apart from other encoders.</p>
<p>Cheers, Dan</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Simpson</title>
		<link>http://dcunningham.net/2009/05/29/encodehd-10940-released/comment-page-1/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcunningham.net/?p=417#comment-645</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say thanks for the hard work!  Im very happy with EncodeHD, great job!

Couple minor requests- 

Id love it if the queue would remove items as they are completed.  Now if I walk away and leave it running, when I come back I see the same list I started with.  Using Handbrake, etc., the convention is to take something from the list when it is complete.

When I encode for iPhone from a .mkv file, it always stretches the video to the iPhone resolution.  The same video as a .mp4 or .avi source maintains the proper original aspect ratio.

Any quality settings?  I find it tends to keep the original quality, which is good, but can mean larger files than other encoders.

Thanks again, great app!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='pce-enabled-section'>Just wanted to say thanks for the hard work!  Im very happy with EncodeHD, great job!</p>
<p>Couple minor requests- </p>
<p>Id love it if the queue would remove items as they are completed.  Now if I walk away and leave it running, when I come back I see the same list I started with.  Using Handbrake, etc., the convention is to take something from the list when it is complete.</p>
<p>When I encode for iPhone from a .mkv file, it always stretches the video to the iPhone resolution.  The same video as a .mp4 or .avi source maintains the proper original aspect ratio.</p>
<p>Any quality settings?  I find it tends to keep the original quality, which is good, but can mean larger files than other encoders.</p>
<p>Thanks again, great app!</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://dcunningham.net/2009/05/29/encodehd-10940-released/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcunningham.net/?p=417#comment-623</guid>
		<description>Dan,

I&#039;m having a problem utilizing EncodeHD - I get an error saying that it can&#039;t resample 6 audio streams into two - I suspect the issue is that I was trying to output to the AppleTV profile, and while the original one only supported stereo, the newer one allows 5.1.  Thus, an updated AppleTV profile or a way to manually override the streams would be nice addition.

thanks,
Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='pce-enabled-section'>Dan,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having a problem utilizing EncodeHD &#8211; I get an error saying that it can&#8217;t resample 6 audio streams into two &#8211; I suspect the issue is that I was trying to output to the AppleTV profile, and while the original one only supported stereo, the newer one allows 5.1.  Thus, an updated AppleTV profile or a way to manually override the streams would be nice addition.</p>
<p>thanks,<br />
Ben</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

