<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random tidbits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dcunningham.net/2007/08/04/random-tidbits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dcunningham.net/2007/08/04/random-tidbits/</link>
	<description>Tech Tools and IT Infrastructure thoughts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Maguire</title>
		<link>http://dcunningham.net/2007/08/04/random-tidbits/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>John Maguire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=45#comment-439</guid>
		<description>Have the same problem. Uninstalled K lite then installed WME 9 before I installed
encode 360 2.03.  No apparent problems during install process.
When I try to open - Message says - Encode360 2.02 (not 2.03????) has stopped working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have the same problem. Uninstalled K lite then installed WME 9 before I installed<br />
encode 360 2.03.  No apparent problems during install process.<br />
When I try to open &#8211; Message says &#8211; Encode360 2.02 (not 2.03????) has stopped working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://dcunningham.net/2007/08/04/random-tidbits/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=45#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan,

i just installed Encode360 and it won&#039;t run.  Vista says that it was shut down by Data Execution Prevention.  I do have Windows Media Encoder installed.  Any ideas??

Also, will it convert the ms-dvr files to WVC1?

Thanks!

-Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan,</p>
<p>i just installed Encode360 and it won&#8217;t run.  Vista says that it was shut down by Data Execution Prevention.  I do have Windows Media Encoder installed.  Any ideas??</p>
<p>Also, will it convert the ms-dvr files to WVC1?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>-Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://dcunningham.net/2007/08/04/random-tidbits/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 04:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=45#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I usually set the priority to &#039;Above Normal&#039; when i run Encode360.  So i&#039;m not entirely sure if that is increasing the encoding speed.  Either way, can&#039;t wait for the next version that has multi-core support.  Amazing work, seriously.  I&#039;ve tried Transcode360 and TVersity and i just can&#039;t get them to work with Vista and my router.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually set the priority to &#8216;Above Normal&#8217; when i run Encode360.  So i&#8217;m not entirely sure if that is increasing the encoding speed.  Either way, can&#8217;t wait for the next version that has multi-core support.  Amazing work, seriously.  I&#8217;ve tried Transcode360 and TVersity and i just can&#8217;t get them to work with Vista and my router.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schlicky</title>
		<link>http://dcunningham.net/2007/08/04/random-tidbits/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Schlicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=45#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I WANT A WASHLET!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WANT A WASHLET!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dcunningham.net/2007/08/04/random-tidbits/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 08:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=45#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Dustin: From what people are telling me, it&#039;s only running on 50% on each core of a dual-core machine. If we can notch that up on each, performance should improve.

Matt: I&#039;ve spent months trying to solve that issue. If I could even just get a more descriptive error about not having WME9 installed I&#039;d be happy. My latest &#039;attempt&#039; at working around this was building the installer which checks for WME9 before it&#039;ll allow the install. It seems that in some cases though, this doesn&#039;t always work and still allows the install to happen without WME9. Will keep racking my brain though to see if I can do something better....

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dustin: From what people are telling me, it&#8217;s only running on 50% on each core of a dual-core machine. If we can notch that up on each, performance should improve.</p>
<p>Matt: I&#8217;ve spent months trying to solve that issue. If I could even just get a more descriptive error about not having WME9 installed I&#8217;d be happy. My latest &#8216;attempt&#8217; at working around this was building the installer which checks for WME9 before it&#8217;ll allow the install. It seems that in some cases though, this doesn&#8217;t always work and still allows the install to happen without WME9. Will keep racking my brain though to see if I can do something better&#8230;.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
